2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 520 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1400 mm |