2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1995 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 1995 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1995 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1995 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | Mustang | Wagon |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1089 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |