2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Buick Century
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Century. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Century would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1996 Buick Century. (119 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Buick Century.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Buick Century. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Buick Century.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1996 Buick Century | |
Make | Ford | Buick |
Model | Mustang | Century |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 119 HP |
Torque | 411 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4803 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1364 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2662 mm |