2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet would be higher. At 3,931 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 1996 Volkswagen Cabriolet
Make Ford Volkswagen
Model Mustang Cabriolet
Year Released 2004 1996
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3931 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 165 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4080 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2480 mm