2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 868 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Mustang | Smart |
Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1460 mm |