2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (150 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura CL weights approximately 38 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Mustang | CL |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |