2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (212 HP @ 4450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 639 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (393 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Econoline |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4450 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 393 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3510 mm |