2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 805 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | Econoline |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3510 mm |