2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 252 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan C 52. (354 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | C 52 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |
