2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Nissan R 391
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan R 391. (359 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1999 Nissan R 391 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Mustang | R 391 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
