2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki C2 (251 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki C2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 668 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Mustang | C2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 852 kg |
