2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1999 Tata E220
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Tata E220 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1999 Tata E220. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Tata E220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Tata E220 weights approximately 76 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Tata E220. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Tata E220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1999 Tata E220 | |
| Make | Ford | Tata |
| Model | Mustang | E220 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3802 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2810 mm |
