2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2001 Holden UTE

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2001 Holden UTE. (302 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 126 kg more than 2001 Holden UTE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Holden UTE. (460 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Holden UTE.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 2001 Holden UTE
Make Ford Holden
Model Mustang UTE
Year Released 2004 2001
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4589 cc 5665 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 390 HP 302 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 460 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1716 kg 1590 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2950 mm