2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 202 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.

Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (410 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 2002 Ford Ranger
Make Ford Ford
Model Mustang Ranger
Year Released 2004 2002
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4605 cc 2300 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 261 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 410 Nm 207 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Vehicle Weight 1518 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 55 L