2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2002 Jaguar XJ. (240 HP @ 6350 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 48 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar XJ. (316 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar XJ.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 2002 Jaguar XJ
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Mustang XJ
Year Released 2004 2002
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4589 cc 3248 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 390 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6350 RPM
Torque 529 Nm 316 Nm
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 70 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1662 kg 1710 kg
Vehicle Length 4670 mm 5160 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2880 mm