2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Lancia Ypsilon
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lancia Ypsilon would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 305 more horse power than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 752 kg more than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lancia Ypsilon.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2003 Lancia Ypsilon | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Mustang | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 113 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 78.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 47 L |