2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, both 2004 Ford Mustang and 2004 Ford F-150 were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 169 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | F-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3801 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 95 L |