2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2004 Lincoln Aviator
To start off, both 2004 Ford Mustang and 2004 Lincoln Aviator were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2004 Ford Mustang and 2004 Lincoln Aviator are equipped with a 4,605 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln Aviator (302 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (260 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln Aviator should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 667 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Aviator. (407 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Aviator.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2004 Lincoln Aviator | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Mustang | Aviator |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 411 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |