2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Lincoln Aviator
To start off, 2005 Lincoln Aviator is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. Both 2004 Ford Mustang and 2005 Lincoln Aviator are equipped with a 4,605 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (305 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. (302 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln Aviator weights approximately 616 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln Aviator. (407 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln Aviator.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 2005 Lincoln Aviator | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | Mustang | Aviator |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 302 HP |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1574 kg | 2190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |
