2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Tazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 572 kg more than 2005 Toyota Tazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (103 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Tazz.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Tazz |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1295 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 77.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 948 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |