2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. Both 2004 Ford Mustang and 2007 Ford E-150 are equipped with a 4,605 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (434 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 132 L |
