2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 81 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Condor |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4599 cc | 2436 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 434 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |