2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Cube. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (411 Nm) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Cube. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Cube |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 411 Nm | 127 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 82 L |