2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2009 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2009 Peugeot 207 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (300 HP) has 148 more horse power than 2009 Peugeot 207. (152 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2009 Peugeot 207.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 2009 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Mustang | 207 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 152 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1397 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
