2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover. (375 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 922 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Because 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover. (508 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Mustang | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 508 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 2584 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2878 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 104 L |