2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Audi A6. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi A6.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A6 (350 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm). This means 2012 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Mustang | A6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 75 L |