2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 296 more horse power than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2012 Chrysler Ypsilon | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | Mustang | Ypsilon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 94 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2390 mm |