2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (435 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Ford | Proton |
| Model | Mustang | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 435 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 544 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
