2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 99 more horse power than 2013 Lexus RX. (291 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2013 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 388 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lexus RX. (317 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2013 Lexus RX | |
Make | Ford | Lexus |
Model | Mustang | RX |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 291 HP |
Torque | 529 Nm | 317 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 12.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |