2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher.
Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (544 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Mustang | Cooper |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 435 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 544 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1892 mm |