2004 Ford Mustang vs. 2013 Porsche Cayenne
To start off, 2013 Porsche Cayenne is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Porsche Cayenne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Porsche Cayenne (542 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 351 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Porsche Cayenne should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Porsche Cayenne weights approximately 947 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Porsche Cayenne is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Porsche Cayenne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Porsche Cayenne (750 Nm) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Mustang. (298 Nm). This means 2013 Porsche Cayenne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 2013 Porsche Cayenne | |
Make | Ford | Porsche |
Model | Mustang | Cayenne |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 750 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.5 : 1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4796 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2895 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |