2004 Ford Puma vs. 1962 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Puma (104 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Toyota Crown weights approximately 220 kg more than 2004 Ford Puma.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Toyota Crown. (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Puma | 1962 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Puma | Crown |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1678 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 22.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |
