2004 Ford Puma vs. 1971 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1971 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Puma (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Puma weights approximately 95 kg more than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Puma | 1971 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Puma | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1971 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1678 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2210 mm |