2004 Ford Puma vs. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Monteverdi Tiara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Monteverdi Tiara would be higher. At 3,837 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Monteverdi Tiara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara (201 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2004 Ford Puma. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Monteverdi Tiara should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Monteverdi Tiara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Puma | 1982 Monteverdi Tiara | |
Make | Ford | Monteverdi |
Model | Puma | Tiara |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1678 cc | 3837 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3080 mm |