2004 Ford Puma vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Puma (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 360 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2004 Ford Puma.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 360 (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Puma. (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Puma | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Puma | 360 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1678 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 58 L |
