2004 Ford Puma vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Ford Puma. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Puma.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Puma | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Puma | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1678 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4690 mm |
