2004 Ford Puma vs. 2002 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 1,678 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Puma (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Samsung SM3. (95 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2002 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2004 Ford Puma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Puma | 2002 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Ford | Samsung |
Model | Puma | SM3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1678 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |