2004 Ford Puma vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 1,678 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Puma (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Puma weights approximately 230 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForTwo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Puma 2002 Smart ForTwo
Make Ford Smart
Model Puma ForTwo
Year Released 2004 2002
Body Type Coupe Coupe
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1678 cc 799 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 40 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 100 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 65.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 79 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 18.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1035 kg 805 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 2510 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1520 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 1820 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 22 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]