2004 Ford Puma vs. 2004 Mazda 2

To start off, both 2004 Ford Puma and 2004 Mazda 2 were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,678 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Puma (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 2 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2004 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 2 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Puma. (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Puma.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Puma 2004 Mazda 2
Make Ford Mazda
Model Puma 2
Year Released 2004 2004
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1678 cc 1242 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 74 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 72 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1035 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 3930 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 45 L