2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1954 Singer Hunter
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Singer Hunter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Singer Hunter would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 502 kg more than 1954 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1954 Singer Hunter | |
| Make | Ford | Singer |
| Model | Ranger | Hunter |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2180 mm |
