2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 92 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Ranger | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2980 mm |