2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (251 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2540 mm |
