2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1960 Peugeot 403
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Peugeot 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Peugeot 403 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1960 Peugeot 403. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 Peugeot 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 412 kg more than 1960 Peugeot 403. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1960 Peugeot 403 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 403 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1642 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 50 L |