2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1962 Holden EK | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | EK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 323 Nm | 164 Nm |