2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 692 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Ranger | Grand Wagoneer |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 5898 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2800 mm |
