2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1962 MG Midget
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 MG Midget. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 MG Midget would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 985 kg more than 1962 MG Midget.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 MG Midget. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1962 MG Midget | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Ranger | Midget |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 46 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1372 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1232 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2032 mm |
