2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 348 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | Ranger | 1500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 40 L |