2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1970 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 1970 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ranger | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1497 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |