2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 37 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Ranger | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2700 mm |
