2004 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 Reliant SE6
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Reliant SE6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Reliant SE6 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1976 Reliant SE6. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1976 Reliant SE6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Reliant SE6 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Reliant SE6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Reliant SE6. (233 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Reliant SE6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Ranger | 1976 Reliant SE6 | |
| Make | Ford | Reliant |
| Model | Ranger | SE6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4015 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2650 mm |
